K. J. Abrahams,1 J. N. Orce,1, 2 L. P. Gaffney,3, 4 D. G. Jenkins,5, 1
T. R. Rodríguez,6 N. Bernier,1, ∗ E. H. Akakpo,1, 7 G. de Angelis,8
M. J. G. Borge,4 A. Brown,5 D. T. Doherty,9 P. E. Garrett,10,1 S. Giannopoulos,4
K. Johnston,4 M. Kumar Raju,1, 11 E. J. Mart´ın Montes,1 D. L. Mavela,1
S. Masango,1 C. V. Mehl,1 D. R. Napoli,12 B. S. Nara Singh,13 C. Ngwetsheni,1
S. S. Ntshangase,7 G. G. O’Neill,1 P. Spagnoletti,13 G. Rainovski,14
F. Recchia,15, 16 R. Wadsworth,5 N. Warr,17 and R. Zidarova4, 14
1Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of the Western Cape, P/B X17, Bellville, 7535 South Africa
2National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences (NITheCS), South Africa
3Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom 4ISOLDE, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
5School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
6Departamento de Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electr´énica and IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040, Madrid, Spain
7Department of Physics & Engineering, University of Zululand, P/B X1001, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa
8INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
9Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom 10Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph N1G 2W1 Ontario, Canada
11iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, P.O. Box 722, Somerset West 7129, South Africa
12Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
13School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, United Kingdom
14Faculty of Physics, St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
15Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, University degli Studi di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
16INFN, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
17Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne 50937, Germany
The presence of both well-deformed prolate and oblate deformations is expected in the A ≈ 70 mass region because of the surprisingly large single-particle energy gaps at N = 34. Nonetheless, oblate deformations in this region have mostly been inferred from rotational bands (68Se [1]) or model-dependent decay measurements (72Kr [2]). Only recently, Coulomb-excitation measurements have been able to determine the sign of the quadrupole moment in a few proton-rich nuclei in this region; conclusively prolate in 74,76Kr [3] and slightly oblate in 70Se [4,5], although with large uncertainties. As inferred for 68Se, the N = 34 isotone 66Ge is another candidate to possess a large oblate deformation in its ground state.
The measurement of the spectroscopic quadrupole moment for the first 2+ excitation, Q(2+) and shape coexistence in the neutron-deficient isotope of 66Ge have been investigated using the 196Pt(66Ge,66Ge)196Pt Coulomb-excitation reaction at 4.395 MeV/u with the MINIBALL spec-trometer and double-sided silicon detectors. To accurately determine the beam purity, the beam was implanted on an aluminium foil and let to decay. Here, we present results from the analysis of the Coulomb-excitation and β-decay data sets, which suggest a strong oblate collectivity with a large E2 strength and a potentially large oblate deformation. As found in previous work [3,6], the triaxial degree of freedom seems to be relevant, as also inferred in this work from beyond mean-field calculations where the collective wave functions go from soft in the ground state to a well-defined minimum as the angular momentum increases.
[1]S. M. Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4064 (2000).
[2]J. A. Briz et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 054326 (2015).
[3]E. Clément et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 054313 (2007).
[4]J. Ljungvall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102502 (2008).
[5]A. M. Hurst et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 072501 (2007).
[6]A. Obertelli et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 031304(R) (2009).